Finally, we have the responsivity principle. Higgins, J. Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. The development of a brief actuarial scale for sexual offense recidivism. The treatment took place in special institutions that contain elements of social-therapeutic prisons and forensic hospitals.
When we conduct risk assessments we are essentially sampling the rewards and costs associated with criminal conduct.
Doing evaluation in criminology: Balancing scientific and stand sex offender treatment in Ontario demands. Maximize the offender's ability to learn from a rehabilitative intervention by providing cognitive behavioural treatment and tailoring the intervention to the learning style, motivation, abilities and strengths of the offender.
Many answered that punishment or deterrence could reduce criminal behaviour. A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: risk, need, responsivity, and process issues.
Littell, J. What is notable in this stand sex offender treatment in Ontario is that third and fourth generation risk assessment instruments would not have been possible without the risk-need-responsivity model of offender assessment and rehabilitation. Comment : The results are basically in line with our findings in that a prison-based treatment of mainly low to moderate risk sexual offenders showed only a weak effect.
Haisch Eds. This is not to say that other approaches to risk assessment and treatment have not made important contributions. This study is a further U. Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders.
Sustainability of the effectiveness of a programme of Multisystemic Treatment MST across participant groups in the second year of operation. Many answered that punishment or deterrence could reduce criminal behaviour. However, in everyday practice there is a tremendous pressure to focus resources on lower risk offenders.
Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2 , 3—